Some folks are wondering why this chemotherapy decision is so important. Since most of us associate chemo as the standard cancer treatment, isn’t this expected? Well, the answer is mostly simple, but slightly complicated.
Here’s a little cancer school. When cancer spreads to other organs, the cancer cells that have invaded are still of the type where the cancer originated, i.e. the breast. So even though the cancer is in, for example, her bones, it’s still breast cancer. Now most breast, prostate, and ovarian cancers are dependent on hormones (estrogen or testosterone) for survival. This has led to successful treatments that involve various ways of blocking hormones.
It’s very ironic, but the primary treatment for early stage breast cancer is typically harsher than for metastatic disease. Early stage treatment usually involves surgery to remove the tumor and possibly the breast, radiation to the tumor site, chemotherapy, and finally hormone therapy. All this is done to try to cure cancer by physically removing as much of the cancer as possible and beating down the few remaining cancerous cells to minimize the chance of recurrence. However, treating advanced cancer (“mets”) is different. The aim is to keep symptoms under control, keep the cancer from spreading (but it can’t be completely eliminated), and keep Laura as happy and healthy for as long as possible. As a result, it’s actually common to use hormone therapy as the primary treatment. It has minimal side effects and it’s effective in most women. If it doesn’t work then that means that treatment options and future successes are more difficult. So the success or failure of hormone therapy for people with mets is a big deal.
Beyond that, this is just a big deal from an emotional perspective. Statistically speaking, most mets to bone and “soft tissue” (like pleura) are slow growing. And cancer like Laura’s that was tested as being so-called ER+ (referring to estrogen receptors) are responsive to hormone therapy. We were also told that hormone therapy is slower acting, so we assumed that a poor scan after just 6 weeks of treatment would not alter her treatment. Another point is that there isn’t just one hormone treatment: there are many — so we also figured that one failure would mean that she would try another. In short we were expecting a relatively slow pace for treatment with time for deliberate experimentation of multiple hormone therapies if there were difficulties. Since that didn’t come to pass, it’s been a shock.
Lastly, chemotherapy is just plain frightening. Chemo is a type of poison that attacks rapidly multiplying cells in the body — mostly indiscriminately (although there are some emerging “targeted” drugs). This means that all such cells — like white blood cells and hair — along with cancer cells are killed. Administration of chemo involves sitting in a soft chair for several hours as the drugs slowly drip into an IV. Chemo is a nasty SOB. And Laura is pretty freaked out over it. Optimistically, there are augmenting drugs to minimize the side effects and the treatment doesn’t last forever, but that doesn’t make it more desirable.
Hormone vs chemo therapy
Tue, Oct 2nd, 2007 12:13am by dkulp
Tags: Uncategorized
1 response so far ↓
1 Ali // Oct 2, 2007 at 6:24 pm
Hey guys –
I’ve been wondering how you all are and I’m glad you are getting settled in your new home (it’s quite beautiful).
Jeri shared the website and I’m so glad I’m able to find out about how things are with you. You know how things come in threes? This cancer seems to hold quite the spot light for me recently – My grandmother just finished her radiation treatment for her (mild) breast cancer; and my good friend here in San Diego just found a lump on a pre-surgery check to schedule her double mastectomy – she and her sister have the gene and they are both doing hysterectomys and double masts to prevent it (it took both her mother and grandmother and is trying to take her aunt). I was quite saddened when I found out this news.
If there is anything you need – please let me know. Your in our thoughts (and my parents — they still remember your visit) and interestingly I still play the tapes and CDs you made me over the last (yikes) almost 20 (are we that old now?) years – they elicit a lot of memories.
Steve and I are moving back to the east coast at the beginning of December. And Massachusetts is part of my work territory now so I may be visiting. I’d love to meet the girls – they look so much like – well, both of you.
Please take care of yourself. I’ll continue to virtually “check” in on you. David – thanks for putting this together. I’m so glad you have each other and Lily and Naomi.
-Ali